2019

Review: HEAT 0.5 Combat Rifle Class: Bob & Mike (Father & Son)

Bob:

I attended HEAT 0.5 mid-May with my son to improve his basic carbine skills and as a refresher course for myself. This is my third MVT class having attended HEAT 1 twice.

As the first 2 days of HEAT 1, HEAT 0.5 is an excellent weapon manipulation and familiarization course that layers on skills required to advance to the tactical range. Scott is an excellent instructor providing grounded truth based on years of experience about the the selection, use, manipulation and maintenance of the AR platform with safety being paramount in everything that is done. If you are starting out on the AR platform, this is the course for you. As outlined on the website, you move from familiarization and zeroing progressing through various skills & drills to basic fire and movement drills. 

The class had students with multiple skill levels which Scott elevated together to the appropriate level of proficiency for the various drills.
Whether learning the platform and the basics or preparing for additional tactical training (which I highly recommend!), HEAT 0.5 is the perfect class. As an improvement to earlier classes, the added awning system and new target holders greatly improved the experience; the awnings protecting us from the sun & the rain.


Mike:

HEAT 0.5 was a very educational and eye-opening experience for me. Before going to HEAT .5 I had taken a defensive carbine course and put at most a couple hundred rounds through the AR platform at an indoor range. HEAT o.5 taught everything that was in the defensive carbine course and then continued to go into so much more depth.

The class started off with a safety brief, and it was apparent throughout the entire class that safety was paramount. Then everyone zeroed their rifles which took some time due to some people bringing never been fired rifles or new optics, but this did not affect our instructional time. We then went over stoppages, shooting from different positions (which included using our non-dominant side), shooting on the move, and about a dozen other drills. The drills we did throughout the two-day class continuously built on each other in a layered manner. The later drills forced you to utilize the information taught in the beginning, or you simply would not be able to properly perform the drills.

Not only did I, someone relatively new to shooting with an AR, learn a lot of valuable information, but others there who were much more experienced learned and gained invaluable experience.

I thought the instructor (Scott) was excellent. He was professional and very knowledgeable in everything that was gone over. His experience in the military, knowledge of the AR platform, and other shooting courses he has attended, made me confident that what I was being taught was top quality.

Overall, HEAT 0.5 was great learning experience. I feel significantly more comfortable with the AR platform, and eager to go onto HEAT 1 in the future.

Mike


Bob and Mike just took the last two places on the HEAT 1 class in June.

Next HEAT 0.5 Class: September 7-8.

BOOK HEAT 0.5 SEPT 7-8 HERE


Review: Close Quarter Battle Course (CQBC) May 2019 – Rich

Day 1 on the Flat Range

This 3-day course was easily 4 weeks of training compressed into 3 days of critical skills and essential techniques for combat in built-up structures. That said, little was left untrained or at least undiscussed, so given the limited time we had, it was not to our detriment at all. We covered a huge amount of ground with CQB basics, and although room clearing and target discrimination in dark and cramped spaces are very violent and harrowing mission sets, every second of it was enjoyable and exciting, while also rewarding and eye-opening…

I’ll reveal some of my background: I am active duty military serving in a special mission unit. We have training similar to this available, and it is very, very good, but reserved as a pre-deployment requirement, or unit-mandated for combat arms teams, and always at a premium with few and far-between open slots. MVT’s CQB evolution offered training on par with that, if for only 3 days, and with more tailored attention to the individual students, in my opinion. Another pro here is Max’s curriculum – derived from a plethora of experience from his own service, best practices of teams he’s hosted at MVT, and some techniques he personally developed. Here we’re beyond just service or unit operations doctrine, but receiving the best of all worlds.

Day 2: Force on Target Drills.

There were a few broad topics through which Max and Johnny Mac guided us from the ground up. Weapons handling and shoot-move-communicate basics were painstakingly coached, and applied constantly through progressively more advanced movements and space negotiation. We got the crawl-walk-run method of learning, but no babying at all; if you messed up, Max told you about it, you did it again the right way, and we moved on. This place is not in the business of wasting your time.

The use of AirSim in lieu of classic man-markers might make someone who hasn’t used this system chuckle at the prospect of ”airsoft”, but don’t be fooled – those rounds fly at an average speed of 375 FPS, and my thigh and shoulder bruises speak for themselves on the effect. Mentally, we were caught in that grey zone where we knew everything was nonlethal, but still had that primal fear of pain. Therefore, the group had a tendency to go rather slowly through the shoot house exercises, and I believe it was through over-caution and the fear of being shot. Yes; AirSim does the job very well. To our fortune, Max and Johnny Mac pushed us past those mental blocks, and every movement got faster, more precise, and better than the last.

Some take-away notes:
– pre-load your magazines and bring more than you think you need; waste less time reloading on the flat range
– leave your ego at the gate; the cadre and fellow students are experts and consummate professionals with a lot to teach
– train to win the fight; treat every exercise as a real-world event and don’t cheat yourself by skimping on plates, personal protection equipment, and attitude
– stop and pay attention to the feedback; after every training move, students get feedback from Max and the other cadre, and it will benefit you greatly to focus on that and learn from others’ challenges
– for AirSim, do yourself a huge solid and bring something which covers your whole face, including ears i.e. a paintball mask
– take the training seriously, but don’t stop yourself from having a laugh or two with your team; your trainers and fellow students are solid people and really appreciate what it takes physically and mentally to be there with them

Bottom line: the quality of instruction, density and speed of training, techniques put into practice, and production value i.e. the training grounds and AirSim trainers provided, made these 3 days some of the most value-added training out there.


Review: HEAT 2 2018 by Jack

I took HEAT 1 (CTT) back in April 2016.  I was amazed by how much I remembered from HEAT 1.

Thursday of HEAT 2 was a review of HEAT1.  It was good to refresh my understanding of bounding over watch, moving in buddy pairs, and a 5 man group.  Move / Fire was added to assault enemy positions.  Manikins were added to the positions to paint the picture of the enemy being down which helped students understand what they were doing near the enemy positions.  Safety angles were reinforced at all times.  I felt safe at all times during the drills.  Scott constantly reminded us who was the only one that could RTR while reinforcing the danger areas of each drill and why we were shifting fire or keeping our hands off of our weapons.  Max and Scott described the training artificialities so that we would understand the way the drills would be done during a real event. 

10 Man Squad On Line Move / Fire Assault.

HEAT 2 having HEAT 1 as a prerequisite and a fitness standard brought students that were professional, prepared, and competent.  That kept the drills flowing smoothly and there were only a few weapons malfunctions.  Scott shared the tip of carrying a spare bolt carrier group which made a lot of sense to me.  Think of it like a spare tire for your vehicle. 

Friday introduced us to reconnaissance patrol.  God bless the people that do these patrols for a living!  Lecture using visual aids followed by rehearsals, then hands on repetitions.  I must work on my ghost walk.  Right now it is more like elephant walk.  It was amazing how loud the Velcro was on my glove that I removed to take pictures of the objective.  It also led me to add some repair buckles to my cummerbund of my plate carrier so that it can be removed silently.  The recon patrol was conducted just before it turned dark, which allowed us to experience observing the objective during day and night. 

Saturday we learned about ambushes through lecture, rehearsals, and hands on.  We got repetition through the left stop group, and assault group.  Once our performance was “Not Bad” a casualty was introduced to add some chaos to the drill.  Thanks for your help JohnnyMac!  I learned to not overthink little things like getting over a waist high pile of logs and branches.  It helped to ramp up my aggressiveness which was clearly needed after the first repetition.  60 round magazines came in handy. 

Sunday was a culmination of everything learned so far that led us into hasty attack and raid drills.  Scott again reminded us of the safety angles, shifting fire, and getting our hands off our weapons.  The drill was complex with both the support by fire group and the assault group trading places during the drills.  It was clear why we need more than four magazines within reach.  There were no out of control egos in the class.  It was so good to see some of the students from other classes.  Socks, thank you for all  your help reminding me of tactics.  There was good mix of police officers, computer guys, and salesmen.  If you want a proving ground for you gear. If you want to prepare for the unknown.  Train at MVT.

Gear Reminders:

-Bring a case of water

-layer in a way that allows you to start out cold, you will get hot quick

-lube rifle frequently

-spare bolt carrier group

-binoculars for recon patrol

-tubes/side release buckles for plate carrier removal during observation

-60 round mags to start in the rifle/Surefire 60 or Pmag D60 worked great for ambush

-camp chair

The next HEAT 2 is scheduled August 22 – 26. Click HERE for INFO. This is the only HEAT 2 scheduled for 2019. HEAT 2 is a prerequisite for the new HEAT NIGHT OPERATIONS class.

BOOK HEAT 2 AUGUST 22 – 26 NOW

Explanation and Footage of the Move / Fire technique.

Review: Texas Class 2019 by William

Brady, Texas, February 2019

This is my 3rd time to S Central TX to train with Max.  Every year Max brings his A-game, and every year I learn – some are new things, others are better understanding of previously “learned” lessons.

This time I took the opportunity to work as Alpha team leader, meaning point. Max presents opportunities, some formal, some just happen.  The bright side is that the majority of people there have been before, so we all pretty much know capabilities and limitations of each other, but we also encourage one another, albeit with some ribbing.  And yes, I still managed to screw it up.  Max gives his corrections and we move on.  And I screw up again, and get more correction.  To those who’ve heard about the “screaming” – please watch the Texas Raid.  Listen to Max – he gets a message across that even the thickest skull can comprehend, and we did what was needed but LISTEN to his message.

PT.  MVT has changed the PT requirements, and to the betterment of class.  My 1st time at MVT – TX, I was sucking wind – working inside for as long as I have had taken its toll unbeknownst to me. Why?  Because I wasn’t pushing myself.  The 2nd time at MVT – TX, the 2-miler was a pre-requisite.  While that helped some, it still didn’t keep me from cratering – in one day along we had done over 5 miles (as one of the MUCH younger crowd had figured out).  This past class, Max had changed to a functional assessment.  This preparation had a good result (as long as you’re reviewing the functional assessment, also check out JohnnyMac’s 25 days of Fitmas to keep things changed up).

When one is learning brand new subjects, one tends to focus on the major points.  This being my 3rd time here, I found myself focusing on some of the smaller details.  This does NOT mean I understand the maneuver.  It simply means looking and seeing how many different ways that one particular skill can be used.  For example, peeling.  When one finds themselves being flanked, peeling is an option.  Max has given us the basic tools, how/when we use them belong to us – to succeed or fail.

Tribe.  We were a group of people who had come from all over the US to train with like-minded people.  I find myself gravitating towards these folks who supported each other, helped one another, shared ideas/instruction with one another.

Gear.  Where else can you continue to “shake-down” your gear??  Not just learning the patrol techniques but also with Force-on-force….  Seeing what other people are doing, how it works, lessons learned from them, etc.

Application.  The week culminates in force-on-force exercises.  Yes, I know you “think” you understand these concepts that Max has been drilling into us, but how well do you “actually” understand them??  When you see OpFor flanking you, what is your response??  MVT has moved to AirSim which is MUCH better than simunition (UTM).  While the accuracy is a bit down, you can actually see the AirSoft BB traveling, so you can adjust your POA (Point of Aim). Hint – buy your own (MVT carries them on the website) and practice with it, and paint the tip ANY color except the bright orange it is now.

Comeraderie.  Spending time together with like-minded people can be stifling for some.  Yet, time after class, at dinner, in the lodge, at breakfast allowed us to talk about topics only left to the imagination.  It was a pleasure to see people step up and take leadership roles.  Some even mentioned surprising themselves at their boldness. 

I look forward to next year.  So I ask – have you trained with MVT and Max??  If not, why not??


Review: Corporate Force on Force / Team Building Event by Mike

Last week my company along with several clients hosted another team building force on force event with Max Velocity Tactical. We used a privately owned 50 acre site in Chantilly, VA. 90% of the acreage was old cattle grazing land with a 2 story modern house, the rest was small scrub trees lining the roads.

This is the second time we have done this. The last time was in September of 2018 in West Virginia at the Velocity Training Center (VTC). Approximately half of the participants in this event were at the previous one. Again, we had myself and another MVT alumni on hand to “run” the squads, at least in the beginning to get everyone on the same page.

This event was held on a Thursday and a Friday. Thursday’s weather was 30 degrees in the morning and 60 degrees by the afternoon. Friday’s weather was 45 degrees in the morning and 70 degrees by the afternoon.

We spent the first 2 hours of Thursday morning going through basic fire and movement first shown by Max then followed by drills given by the experienced squad leaders. After that we spent another hour going through equipment issue and loading of mags with gas and BB’s. This time also allowed the temperature to rise, ensuring the Gas Blow Back GBB) AirSim weapons would work without issues due to the cold. On a side note there was not a single cold related issue with the weapons. (Max Adds: due to possible cold weather in March, we had boxes of ‘hot hands’ ready to tape on the magazines, which hold the gas, in case it was an issue. These were not needed).

We then spent the rest of the day going through field exercises. The large open areas became a different tactical problem than my experience in WV. Everyone quickly moved through or around the open areas and stayed in whatever tree and scrub line we could find. Using real AR’s the open areas would be free fire zone but the range of the Airsim weapons was such we had to be closer.

At then end of day one we traded war stories, ate some grilled food, and drank until dark.

On Friday we started the day with about 2 hours of CQB instruction and drills. We then utilized the existing 2 story house. We spent about ¾ of the day fighting in the house. We also had a few field exercises as well in the afternoon. At the end of day two we had the group AAR and everyone went home.

I bought a PTS Mega Arms GBB AirSim rifle from Max and the distance was at least 100 yards with an almost flat trajectory. However around 75 yards the BB’s would tend to peel right or left due to wind and speed loss. The rental rifles were significantly less. However, the BB’s can be tracked so you can adjust your fire and walk the rounds onto target. I do not have a sight on my weapon, nor will I put one on it, there is just no need, since I can walk the rounds in. The downside of the BB’s is taking hits without realizing it. If you’re wearing plates, or hard helmets, or chest rigs with mags in them, you simply will not feel the hits. All you can do is hear them, but if you’re shooting or yelling you won’t hear them either. This led to some “discussions” between opposing teams but was all worked out in the end. Just be aware, most people aren’t cheating they simply can’t feel nor hear it.

On a side note my weapon went down with a chopped BB so I had to switch to my GBB sidearm. I was engaging at least 2 hostiles from 2 different directions. I was on my last sidearm magazine with about 5 rounds left when I hear this familiar chuckle from First Sergeant right behind me. (You Alumni know that chuckle) “You’re down to your last mag on your sidearm. Now what are you going to do?” It was one of those moments that you remember.

I was pleasantly surprised at how well the squads came together and operated as a team. Having an experienced squad leader, one who everyone will listen to, is an immense benefit. So should SHTF arrive, having that person is huge, but more importantly having people who are willing to listen will be a whole different matter.

I also realized having that large of an area can be easily managed through radios. We didn’t have them, and several times had to resort to runners or the squad leader being a jack rabbit across the field. I’m a loud person but I couldn’t effectively communicate over that distance; live rounds would have been impossible.

Having guys who are fresh out of college ordering Vice Presidents and Clients around was a good individual improvement as well as team morale. Having so many different levels of life experiences was nice to increase the entire team’s effectiveness. By team I mean the company morale and thereby effectiveness.

Finally, I’d like to thank Max and First Sergeant for their continued help and guidance for these corporate events. The tried and true AAR after each exercise is key for each team and individual to immediately improve.

Max Adds: AirSim tactical training events are an excellent vehicle for the development and improvement of teamwork, leadership, communication and decision making skills. Utilizing AirSim allows both a safe training environment and easy deliverability in accessible space. For example, AirSim can be utilized on rural or wooded areas, unused buildings and even large warehouses, so long as the environment is safe for use. Tactical focus can include rural small unit tactics, close quarter battle in structures, or a mix. This last event was staged in Northern Virginia within sight of a busy road, on a disused former residential horse farm, without incident. MVT will provide a complete package including AirSim rifles, safety gear and magazine carrying equipment. Please contact of you are interested in running your own event.


Review: Texas 2019 Class by Dave

Below is my review of the Texas 2019 MVT class. I will give an overview of the content of the class, and then go into more detail regarding the things that I took from it.

LIVE FIRE TRAINING

Day 1 was spent on the square range, going over fundamental movements. We covered the RTR drill, bounding, and peeling as buddy pairs and teams, as well as the assault through. This was to bring the new people up to speed, and give the alumni a refresher.

Day 2 was Attack Day. The first drill was the River Attack, which gave us the chance to practice bounding forward and then assaulting two enemy positions. This was a four man team drill, with each team running through it twice. After lunch, we ran the Rhodesian pursuit drill from 2018. We used a different patrol formation to practice movement to contact, followed by fire and movement onto the enemy position. After the first contact, we continued movement to reach and assault a second enemy position in a similar manner. We ran this exercise as five man teams, with two buddy pairs and a stick leader; each team ran through twice.

After training in the field all day, we had an evening medical class taught by Max and William. We went over the MARCH protocol, and then got to practice tourniquet application, wound packing, and needle decompression. A beautiful slab of pork ribs and a beef roast were sacrificed for the cause as the tissue models.

Day 3 was Break Contact Day. The first drill was a team movement to contact, followed by bounding to the rear, peeling into cover behind a terrain feature, setting and springing a hasty ambush for the pursuing enemy, and then once again bounding to the rear to break contact.

The second drill of the day was a contact to the flank, followed by a peeling maneuver out of the kill zone. Each team ran this twice, once as a contact right and once as a contact left.

After this, we moved to a wooded area, and practiced a Rhodesian style cover shoot. Upon taking fire from an unseen enemy, the team fired into positions of likely enemy cover, and then fought through the enemy position, slotting floppies all the way. Rather than assaulting through on line as we had done before, each buddy pair bounded forward independently of the other pair, with the stick leader in the middle to keep them roughly on line. This maneuver took SEVERAL tries to get right, and everybody got a taste of the famous MVT Yelling.

Day 4 was Ambush Day. This was the first time we ran exercises as a full squad of 14 (three four man teams, squad leader, radio operator). We also ran the exercises as a full mission, including patrolling in to the objective rally point, leader’s reconnaissance, setting up of a linear ambush with stop groups on the flanks, springing the ambush, assaulting through the kill zone, collapsing the ambush, and withdrawing from the ambush site. We ran two ambushes along a road in the morning and two in the afternoon along a dry creek bed.

The morning ambushes were run as simple drills, without any complications. The afternoon ambushes included elements of free play. On the first ambush, a (simulated) enemy Quick Reaction Force counterattacked as we were collapsing the ambush, resulting in two casualties. We had to fight off the QRF long enough to perform care under fire, and then break contact while extracting the casualties. We got a chance to perform the medical skills learned a few days before, as well as the tactical skills.

I was the squad leader for the second and final ambush exercise of the day. Before we began, I spent some time organizing the squad and making sure everyone understood what to do in the event of an attack by the enemy QRF or casualties. I placed my most experienced guys in the stop groups, and made sure they knew to bound back to the ORP if attacked. I put a medic with a litter in both assault teams, and made sure they knew to stage casualties at the ORP before extracting them to the pickup point. When the scenario began, we took our first casualty during the assault through the kill zone. My radioman immediately called for our (notional) QRF, which ended up saving us a lot of time down the road. Part of the assault team tourniqueted the casualty and dragged him out of the kill zone, and the medic began to perform care under fire. After finishing the assault through, we were collapsing the ambush when we were contacted by the enemy QRF, and sustained a second casualty. It was here that the benefits of having a well-trained squad really showed. The stop groups bounded back and engaged the QRF, while the medics moved the casualties back to the ORP, stabilized them, and organized their extraction. There was very little for me to do as squad leader, because everyone else did their jobs. We extracted the casualties from the ambush site to our pickup point, and the medical team continued to perform the MARCH protocol on them while the remainder of the squad pulled security.

Day 5 was Hasty Attack/Raid Day. We began at the familiar quarry range, with a two team hasty attack. With the two teams moving independently in a nominal satellite patrol type formation, the first came under fire from a position about 200 yards away. The team in contact RTRed, fought into cover, and then won the firefight with the enemy position. While the first team kept the enemy suppressed, the trailing team took a covered route onto the right flank of the enemy position, moved to contact, advanced by fire and movement, and then assaulted through. Each team got to run through the attack twice, once as the support by fire team and once as the assault team.

In the afternoon, we raided an enemy camp in a creek bottom. This was similar in execution to the hasty attack, except that the support by fire moved into position without being contacted by the enemy, and suppressed the enemy camp. The assault team moved to a flank in an ATV, dismounted, bounded up onto the camp, and then assaulted through. Once again, each team got one run through as the assault element, and one as support by fire.

This was the end of the live fire portion of the class.

FORCE ON FORCE TRAINING

On Day 6, we conducted the AirSim Force on Force part of the class. The location was the same strip of woods along the riverbank where we conducted the Rhodesian cover shoot on day 3. In the morning, we ran four Capture The Tea scenarios with a six man team versus a seven man team. Each team had a tree with a radio tied to it as a base and a strategic stockpile of tea, separated by about 200 yards. The first team to capture the tea won.

On the first evolution, both teams left a two man team to guard the base, and sent the remainder of the team to attack the enemy base. The two attacking elements had a meeting engagement in an area of heavy cover, and the red team prevailed. The red team then closed in on the yellow base, killed the remainder of the opposing force and captured the tea.

On the second evolution, red team’s plan was to have three buddy pairs moving independently toward the enemy base. When one pair came in contact, the remaining pair or pairs were to try and move forward through the gaps and flank the enemy. In practice, the formation wound up functioning as a long skirmish line, with each pair moving independently but staying roughly on line. Good fire and movement in the woods allowed red to kill the enemy force, push through the holes in the enemy formation, and capture the tea.

This worked so well that red used the same plan for the third evolution, and it worked nearly as well again. I managed to get myself killed by popping out of the same side of the tree I was hiding behind after a reload.

On the fourth evolution, the red team came up with a more complicated plan. Leaving a buddy pair near their base, a team of four pushed quickly up through dense brush on the riverbank, and deployed on a line, catching the other team’s skirmish line in the flank. This forced the yellow team to redeploy to face the new threat, and allowed red team’s remaining buddy pair to roll them up from the flank. This was another time when the importance of having a well-trained squad showed. The whole squad knew the plan before we began, and when I was killed in the first exchange of fire, my team leaders executed it perfectly without me and won the fight.

After lunch, we reorganized from two equal teams into a ten man squad versus a three man OPFOR. The OPFOR constructed three bunkers around one of the bases, and the squad performed a basic flanking attack.

On the first run, a three man support by fire team moved into a depression in front of the bunkers, while the remaining two teams used the concealment along the river to move to the right flank. One three man team began to assault from a low spot on the flank, with one team remaining as a reserve. When it became clear that enemy bunkers had too much depth for one team to cover, the second team deployed to the right of the first assault team. During the ensuing firefight, all of the OPFOR were killed before the actual assault through.

This exercise was where I bumped up against my limits as a squad leader. I made my two most experienced team leaders the support by fire and assault team commanders. I told myself beforehand that I was not going to micromanage them. When they made contact, and it became clear that the assault team did not have enough coverage to take out the depth bunker, I deployed my reserve team at approximately the right place and time to engage it. However, the reserve team leader did not push the fight as hard as I wanted him to, and the assault and support by fire teams wound up winning the whole fight, while I basically did nothing but watch. Luckily the OPFOR were all killed early on, and there was no need for an assault on the bunkers. I should have gotten in and pushed the reserve team harder when I saw that they weren’t doing it themselves, but didn’t because we were winning. If an assault through had been necessary, we might well have lost a lot of people because I didn’t push them hard enough.

The second squad attack went much like the first, only easier because the attackers now knew the positions of the bunkers. The support by fire team was able to keep the front two bunkers largely suppressed, until one OPFOR was killed by the assault team and one by the assault team. Both elements pushed up onto the final bunker, until the last surviving OPFOR tried to pop smoke and escape, but went down under a hail of plastic BBs. The victorious freedom fighters captured the tea for the last time, and then threw it triumphantly into the river while 1000 electric guitars played “The Star Spangled Banner,” a bald eagle swooped overhead and the ghosts of George Washington, Davy Crockett, Ian Smith, Jed Eckert, and Johnny Cash appeared and gave us a double thumbs up.

The Force on Force day was my favorite day, as it always is. All the techniques we learned worked exactly as they did during the drills, which was a YUUUGE confidence builder. The Force on Force validates the rest of the class, and if you are not doing it you are missing out on a vital part or your training.

AirSim Training Page

AirSim Training Notes (Texas Student)

CONCLUSIONS

I have heard it said that there are no advanced techniques, only brilliance in the basics; and the MVT Texas class for 2019 is a perfect example of this. I had done every drill or exercise before, and yet I still managed to take something new from each one. While moving, I was doing a better job of looking for and taking positions of cover, rather than just moving by rote. I was able to pay better attention to the movements and positions of other team members, because I was no longer devoting my full attention to my own. As a class, we did a better job of winning the firefight before moving, rather than rolling into drills immediately. During free play exercises and Force on Force, I was able to think about how to respond to a changing tactical situation, and control the movements of other team members.

As previously stated, the drills we ran were the same at the bottom, but with added layers of complexity to reflect the growing skills of a class that had a high number of alumni. Throughout the class, we usually ran drills as a five man team instead of four, adding in the position of team leader so that the class had more of an emphasis on leadership training. We sustained more casualties during the free play exercises, and performed much better and more complex medical care upon them. We incorporated a vehicle into the raid scenario.

The leadership element really became obvious during the Force on Force day. Last year, during the fighting for the House of Woe, leadership was at best ad hoc, and usually absent. This year, it was THE key element in victory every time.

It was also great to see the spectrum of learning in the members of the class. We had a broad range of training in the class, from guys taking their first tactical class to five year repeat alumni. You could really see the progression of training. New guys were learning and perfecting basic techniques. Others were leading buddy pairs. Advanced guys were stepping into specialist roles, and leading teams or the squad.

In conclusion, I will just say that the MVT Texas classes continue to get better every year. More experienced students, iterative improvements in complexity and realism, and a heavier emphasis on Force on Force, combined with the improved usability of the AirSim equipment mean that we are learning more and faster as the years go by. I look forward to the class all year long. I can’t wait for 2020!