MVT CADRE Sends: The Critical Question of Accountability by Lee

New MVT Square Range!!!
September 17, 2015
VIDEO : MVT Range Safety Brief: Part 1
September 21, 2015

The Critical Question of Accountability

By Lee

In my last blog post we brought up some of the finer details of Small Unit Tactics that are overlooked by those who have little experience with real life employment of SUT.  A challenge was brought up over the acceptability of changing “buddy pairs” on the fly.  The most succinct comment went as such…

“I flatly disagree with this article. Buddy teams get separated quite a bit during chaotic combat situations. This is why we have SOPs. A 4-man team should be able to bound in any random order.”

There does exist some slight merit to this statement.  Well trained individuals who have worked often enough with each other, they NEED to have the ability to swap partners on the fly.  You must always be prepared for a worst case scenario, which in the case of a four man team, taking even one casualty.  When one or more of your people is incapacitated or dead, reorganization needs to happen fast.

What is NOT acceptable however, is reorganizing pairs and teams in the middle of a gunfight, except in the circumstance of a casualty.  You need to avoid reorganizing under fire if at all possible.  Why do you ask?  Well that’s a matter of having been there, having done that.

I make no bones about the fact that I cut my teeth in SUT in the jungles of S. America.  My first operational experiences were there, and only better prepared me for the urban jungles of Iraq that I would later experience.  The rough and extremely dense nature of the jungle terrain required the utmost in accountability.  In these conditions, even if your entire unit is only four men, it is impossible to maintain visual contact with all four members and keep proper distance between individuals.

In a desert situation, where an individual rifleman can see his entire team, it really is not a big deal if when contact is made, each man scatters randomly and bounds as individuals.  It works, although it is not ideal.  Why it is not ideal is due to what happens in jungle terrain.

Say our four man team is in file formation as depicted below on a recce patrol in the NE woodlands where I live.  It is very thick and you can usually only see the man in front or behind you, but never the whole team.  Andy is running point and his buddy is Bob.  They are AB pair.  Chuck and Dick are CD pair.  Together they are team Knucklehead:

Andy

Bob

Chuck

Dick

Now, team Knucklehead makes unexpected (surprise) contact to the front.  Team Knucklehead is at least smart enough to have a standing SOP to break contact when on recce patrols.  But team Knucklehead thinks it’s okay to just team up and bound in any random order.  So they get online and are set up in this random order before they start bounding back.  Andy went left, Bob went right, and pair CD lost their minds and wedged themselves in between the two.

Andy                 Dick             Chuck              Bob

Now it’s a gunfight people.  And since team Knucklehead “bounds in random order”, Andy decides that Dick is his new buddy, since Dick is all he can see.  Chuck and Dick are already buddies anyway so they just stay buddies, hell they are right next to each other.  Bob can see only Chuck so he decides that Chuck is his buddy, although Chuck does not know this.  This is because team Knucklehead does “random”.  Their SOP is “random”.

Team knucklehead bounds back over a terrain feature, and effectively breaks contact.  They rally up and their formation looks like this…

Andy   Dick   Chuck

Everyone:  Wait! Crap!  Where the f*ck is Bob?  Andy, where is your buddy?

Andy: I dunno I was paired with Dick.

Dick: No you weren’t I was paired with Chuck!

Chuck: Yeah I was right next to Dick.  It was me and him.

Andy:  Well who was with Bob?!

Chuck:  Oh crap, do we have to go back into that mess to find Bob?

You see what happens here is that Bob gets shot, breaks an ankle, goes a different direction, or whatever the case is and NO ONE KNOWS ABOUT IT because we have random accountability.  No one is watching Bob specifically. Now in open terrain, this is usually not a problem since more than likely, someone would have seen Bob go down, or go the wrong way.  They would have known he was gone before rallying up, and done something about it to keep him from getting lost.  But in dense foliage, it is real easy to get separated if you have no specific accountability.

For my MVT Alumni out there, how easy would it be to lose your buddy during a gunfight?  How many of us got sucked into the targets, and paid absolutely no attention to our buddy or the rest of the team?  How many we mercilessly attacked by the Muscle Memory Gorilla about SCANNING and seeing your buddies?  No imagine all that, and having “random” buddies instead of an assigned one.  Uh-oh….  New students have trouble enough keeping track of an assigned buddy until we get properly trained.

Now thankfully Bob only got separated.  He had enough skill to make it back to a rally point and meet back up with team Knucklehead who thankfully had the discipline to ID their targets, and not shoot Bob as he snuck his way alone back to the rally point.

Now team knucklehead has reviewed their SOP’s and changed it to “do or die” buddy pairs.  They also change their call sign to team Lucky.   Now when someone gets separated, cannot move, or whatever the case, team Lucky knows about it BEFORE they accidently leave Bob in the dust and alone.

The point here is at MVT we teach the BEST tactics.  Just because random bounding worked for some guys in the sandbox does not mean it won’t screw you over later (again the specter of survivors bias).  In the Jungle, or where I live in the NE woodlands you will lose contact with your own people during firefights unless you have specific accountability at all times.  (Hell you don’t need a gunfight, it can happen in the middle of a low light patrol).  If your buddy gets hit, we need to know now so he does not get left behind, or we know where to look for him later depending on the tactical situation.  If your buddy starts bounding away and losing contact with the team, YOU need to stop him from getting separated.  RALLYS are NOT the time to find out you lost someone, when you are hundreds of meters away and have an Appalachian mountain in between you.   That being said, you should take accountability on every rally, and not just personnel but casualties, ammunition, and critical equipment.

Left or right, forward or back, for better or worse, STAY WITH YOUR BUDDY!  Do not lose contact with him!

The Exception: If I’m dead, I’m dead.  Grab anything of intelligence value or critical equipment and GO.

Max Adds: Yes, we saw this with some jaw jacking in comments on Lee’s last post. Those who have trained at MVT know the deal. For example, if you have trained at MVT, you will know that on a  break contact left or right drill, where we peel, I focus on peeling as controlled buddy pairs, for precisely the reasons that Lee iterates. If Billy gets hit and falls in the bush, his buddy has an eye on him every bound, so we know about it right then, and not when we take accountability back at the rally point.

If you haven’t trained at MVT, you won’t know about the quality or depth of the training, and your comments lack credibility. MVT training is not your prior service ‘survivor bias’ low level SUT training you received, and were lucky to get away with if you deployed, and it’s not your FM regurgitation with no real world experience to back it up. What the heck do you think we are doing here? High quality light infantry training, for the most part. Come and train, or STFU.

That is all.

6 Comments

  1. shooter says:

    I would like to thank you guys again for taking the time to share this stuff.

    I’m not a combat vet, but having the perspective of an MVT alumnus gives me some frame of reference, so that this kind of stuff makes perfect sense, and is VERY valuable fine-tuning info to augment the field training you’re offering!

  2. ChocolateMilk says:

    I’ve followed this Blog for quite some time, and nothing I’ve read here hasn’t been backed with sensible, intellectual reasoning. As a vet (non combat, sonar submarines), I will second that the FM and other.gov manuals are garbage written by some asshole who has never done the job in the first place. I’ve always enjoyed the straight forward, no bullshit approach of Max and now, competent cadre. Keep teaching this so it remains pertinent to our situation, shtf.

  3. BBQ'd says:

    The name I post under is a reminder of the emphatic emphasis placed upon the battle buddy concept up at MVT. During one training session in the ol’ CRCD class we were working on break contact drills, utilizing 2 buddy pairs (4 man team) when I got “BBQ’d” by Max.

    Contact had been made and we were in the process of RTR, breaking contact, doing the “move”, “moving” portion of the drill. After the second bound we were covering while the other pair were moving. My mag rain dry and I called out “MAG!!!!!!!” to my battle buddy. As I am changing my mag the other team call out “MOVE!!” so my battle buddy calls out “MOVING!!” jumps up and runs off as I am reloading my rifle. As soon as the mag was seated I jumped up and followed my battle buddy and finished the drill. After the drill Max pointed out that I looked like I was at an afternoon BBQ because I did not immediately jump up an run with my battle buddy.

    Truth be told I was under the misconception that if your battle buddy was doing a mag change you both waited and then moved trying to avoid running around with an unloaded rifle. The correction/clarification offered was…no you are getting off the X and if one goes you both go regardless, keeping in mind the other pair are coving you and one can finish the process of reloading once you are relocated and offering covering fire. Lesson learned, notes taken.

    To make sure that lesson sunk in the name “BBQ’d” assures I’ll never forget.

    Learn from my mistake and may all who train with Max forgo being BBQ’d.

  4. Brae Jaeger says:

    Good points in the article.

    Our team’s SOP was to verbally organize. I preferred this in thick woods because frankly I was afraid of being hit by my teammates, and of doing the same.

    Nice videos BTW. It’s impressive somebody is holding squad attack lanes. There’s hope for us yet.